Celerion labs OKed by Brazilian regulators

By Gareth Macdonald

- Last updated on GMT

US early-stage focused CRO Celerion has received Brazilian regulatory approval for research and bioanalysis facilities on both sides of the Atlantic.

Last week Celerion said the Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria ANVISA) had certified operations at labs in its home city Lincoln, Nebraska and in Belfast, Northern Ireland.

Sites certified by ANVISA​ will have the review of their submissions expedited, potential reducing the research process. Furthermore, the organisation only accepts bioavailability/bioequivalence (BA/BE) work that is completely performed at certified sites,

The clearance therefore could be a real boon for Celerion according to CEO Susan Thornton, who explained its significance for the contract research organisations (CRO) business.

By earning ANVISA certification to conduct early clinical studies and bioanalytical research for compounds destined for Brazil, Celerion is now able to better serve our clients’ growing needs in this high–growth, emerging market.”

The certification builds on work begun by former Celerion owner MDS Pharma, which first sought ANVISA approval for the facilities in October 2009 as a result of a client request.

Evidently this is a strategy that Celerion, which was acquired by Bain Capital and SV Life Sciences, still thinks is the right approach.

Clinical Research in Brazil

Brazil, whose pharmaceutical market is set to top $18bn (€12.3m) by 2012 according to most estimates, has one of the most rapidly expanding clinical research sectors. And Celerion is not the only CRO that has had its eye on Brazil’s market of late.

However the Celerion’s approach differs from peers like PRA, Covance and Chiltern ​which have established a physical presence in the country in recent years.

The clinical trials industry in Brazil began to emerge in 1996 when the country moved its rules governing trial more into line with International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines and set a national bioethical committee, CONEP, to investigates institutional review boards (IRBs).

This process continued with the passing of resolution 39 in 2008, which enabled ANVISA and CONEP could review trial protocols in parallel process, as it occurs in Europe, potentially accelerating the process by months.

But, while these new rules have increased the amount of research conducted in Brazil, the ability to develop products for the market at sites in Europe and the US may prove to be an attractive option for international pharma firms.

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Using Define-XML to build more efficient studies

Using Define-XML to build more efficient studies

Content provided by Formedix | 14-Nov-2023 | White Paper

It is commonly thought that Define-XML is simply a dataset descriptor: a way to document what datasets look like, including the names and labels of datasets...

Overcoming rapid growth challenges with process liquid preparation

Overcoming rapid growth challenges with process liquid preparation

Content provided by Thermo Fisher Scientific - Process Liquid Preparation Services | 01-Nov-2023 | Case Study

A growing contract development manufacturing organization (CDMO) was challenged with the need to quickly expand their process liquid and buffer preparation...

Why should you use clinical trial technology?

Why should you use clinical trial technology?

Content provided by Formedix | 01-Nov-2023 | White Paper

New, innovative clinical trial technology is helping to revolutionize the research landscape. COVID-19 demonstrated that clinical trials can be run much...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars